Skip to main content

A comment on Nymphomaniac with reference to Steve McQueen's Shame

The Telegraph’s Jenna McCartney writes that Nymphomaniac, like Steve McQueen’s Shame, is not a ‘story of sex, but a fable of addiction’ but I’d like to argue that Nymphomaniac’s a far more intelligent dissertation on the subject than McQueen’s offering, pushing as it does, the two main characters, Joe {Charlotte Gainsbourg/Stacy Martin} and Seligman {Stellan Skarsgård} to reach various epiphanies and understandings about themselves. Whereas Shame seems like an impressionistic painting in comparison, Nymphomaniac is, as we are warned by Joe at the beginning of the 2 Volumes, ‘a moral story’, with, as McCartney rightly concludes, the pornography being merely ‘on the skin’- a signifier only to the deeper issues the film duly explores.
Many critics are unhappy with Lars von Trier’s efforts, Mark Kermode calling it ‘a cacophony of discordant excess’ but many have also passed over what seems to be the film’s real transgressive nature- not the sex but von Trier’s brutally honest and consistently compassionate exploration of dark and forbidden themes such as pedophilia [I was aware of a collective take in of breath in the audience I was sitting in at that scene], self harm, masochism and polymorphic perversion etc. The emphasis on self-acceptance, desire for change and spiritual development is an exercise in pedagogy. Everyone’s making much of the film’s lack of sense of place, inconsistent accents and melodramatic ending {essential if Joe is to continue her quest}. There are also complaints about what is seen as von Trier’s pseudo intellectualism with his references to Tarkovsky’s Andrei Rublev, Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut, Bach and Fibonacci etc and a soundtrack where Shostakovich and Rammstein battle it out for space, but these criticisms seem merely reductive and a convenient way of avoiding what Lars von Trier, with his rude disregard for cinematic convention, is trying to do.
Sure this is, on the surface, a portrait of a woman exploring her sexuality and who is at times, a person held prisoner to it - but this is only a glib explanation. It’s real message seems to be about transgression- moral transgression and to what extent and personal cost it is necessary, and in being so, pushes boundaries that other directors, Steve McQueen included, daren’t go near. Joe is a character who advocates agency, whose actions bring others to personal crises, who practices expression rather than repression {somewhere in Vol 2 Joe explains to Seligman that if a word is prohibited then we are further removed from a democratic state {sure von Trier is referring to that incident back in Cannes but there is a narrative meaning also}} and who, rather than wallowing in self pity and taking a masochistic pleasure in the loneliness of her life {after all she talks about walking around waiting for permission to die}, tries to do something about it- she perhaps sees behind her fantasies to the real desires behind. Because of this Nymphomaniac is a hugely positive and life affirming film {for Joe}, even if it includes a scene {a reworking of the beginning of Anti-Christ} where Joe chooses to put her own needs above that of her child, with nearly fatal consequences.
Because Shame is the most recent and well-known Western film to tackle sex addiction before Nymphomaniac, there are the inevitable comparisons. But the two directors sit on different ends of the spectrum- McQueen’s approach remains at a more visceral level, not wanting to probe into the depths of his characters’ minds, whilst von Trier constantly imbues his mise en scene and protagonists with irony and self-reflection. References to the Great Whore of Babylon and spontaneous orgasm, The Little Organ School and the like are mere Twitter Handles to deeper meanings, most of which von Trier leaves to the audience to work out.
Shortly after seeing the Vol1 & Vol2 on Saturday, I wrote on Twitter that this is what cinema is for- where characters get to analyze and debate about themselves and their experiences and challenge the social norms that give rise to most of people’s daily conformity. I still stand by this, even after a couple of day’s reflection.. we need more filmmakers like von Trier and more films like this now more than ever.


Popular posts from this blog

Collabo- Hip hop with a difference

There’s a buzz in the air at Stratford Circus Arts Centre. No wonder, this is the 10th anniversary of Collabo, Tony Adigun’s annual dance celebration founded in 2006 to promote new collaborations and hip-hop hybrids from dance groups. Friday’s program of short portfolios opens with 10 (UnTitled Dance Company) choreographed by Lukas McFarlane lasting fifteen minutes (no mean feat in the hip-hop world) and featuring 10 tracks and illustrating some super synchronised steps and gyros executed with military precision. The occasional, surprising rigidness of the choreography is broken by experimentation with spoken word. Liberation (What Is Written Dance Company) has the same exactness, but their more simple choreography is easier on the eye after the mass sprawl of 10. Kweku Aacht and Guest Dancers produce an interpretation of a track performed live onstage- the sometimes rowdy crowd shouting out and encouraging the performers on hold their breath as the troupe fluctuate between free style a…

Once in a Lifetime- theatre review: slightly revised to reflect the ambiguous ending

Once in a Lifetime is a show about the tenuous and complicated relationship between creativity and destruction. Re-adapted here by Chris Hart, son of one half of the original writing duo Moss Hart and George S Kaufman, the show may well be set in 1930s Hollywood just as the talkies are about to change cinema forever, but it might also be poking fun at an art form that is a little closer to home. Director Richard Jones always takes risks with little produced, marginalised or very well known works in a bid to uncover something new that might be a comment on our own times. Here, a story about hapless Vaudeville trio act George (John Marquez), Jerry (Kevin Bishop) and May (Claudie Blakley), who set out to conquer Hollywood with their mythic elocution school, is the perfect fit for the director to explore themes that seem to obsess him: national myth, parody, the tyranny of power, willed self-destruction, bureaucracy, global fantasy, etc. So far, the show has not gone down so well with the c…

Walking the Tightrope- Theatre Delicatessen

Site-specific set? Perhaps. In the old Guardian offices in Farringdon, Offstage Theatre and Theatre Uncut curate a cycle of 12 short plays exploring the tension[s] between art and politics, reactions to the budget cuts to the arts in the UK and debate freedom of expression controversies. Corruption, class divides, perception, blood money, gesture politics and culpability, it’s all there and recent topical events are given stage time, from The Tricycle’s controversial decision to withdraw their support for the UK Jewish Film Festival to the Barbican’s cancelled Exhibit B. The plays are entertaining- Sun City by April De Angelis, Re: Exhibit by Gbolahan Obisesan, Old Newland by Julie Pascal, Tickets are on Sale Now by Caryl Churchill and Exhibit A, by Neil LaBute, all deserve special mention for looking beyond the parameters of funding and freedom of expression in the UK arts- by which of course, I mean a theatrical London still surfing the very last trickling waves of Colonialism and it…