Skip to main content

A View from the Bridge, Young Vic, further brief thoughts

some brief notes on A View after seeing it again...

minimalist staging allows room for thought and concentration

this is a production about a man who loves too much and can't let go... because letting go of something will reveal something else to him about himself?

it is about the will to power, which is prised out of Eddie?

is it about paedophilia or incest- no I don't think so
because it is not perverse..the interpretation of Eddie is not does not even seem sexual
there is no sex there on stage between them
yes he touches her but there doesn't seem to be primary exclusive attraction to his niece
Eddie is not someone you can feel afraid of, he is not sadistic, he is not someone who seems to enjoy power over his niece although he does not want it removed
he is unaware of himself
his niece is afraid of his 'undefined' love but not him. not physically afraid. One does not, as an audience member, I don't think, feel afraid for Catherine. Or feel afraid of Eddie. This is not about sexual or even physical violence.
it can't be because it does not carry any undertone of abuse, fear or terror that comes with abuse and incest.

what is the interpretation here?
I have to admit to some confusion although I think this confusion is good
Mark Strong's Eddie is restrained. Introverted. Confused. Unable to locate Eddie within Eddie. Asexual? he won't have sex with his wife. He touches but does not seem to want to possess Catherine. What of the kiss with Rodolpho? Is Eddie actually gay? bisexual? and he does not know it or does and finds it let loose with Rodolpho? is this what the community cannot stand? not that Eddie betrayed Marco and Rodolpho but that he kissed Rodolpho and in doing so, revealed something of his own sexuality he did not know?
is this also homoerotic? is Eddie repressing homosexual feelings
I think yes

his relationship with his niece survives until Rodolpho because it suppresses her sex, it does not encourage it

the women do not understand

Rodolpho coming onto the scene opens it out, but instead of making this even more dangerous for Eddie, in terms of encouraging his own sexual attraction for her, only threatens the destruction of his own relationship with her

if Eddie does want to sleep with her, it is because that would symbolise his power over her?/

Beatrice is showing more awareness than I saw previously over Eddie's relations with the niece. But the awareness is confused because Eddie's motivation and intention seems confused

she does not know what she is losing and to whom, although she thinks knows

what she is losing is Eddie to men

think to the beginning of the play.. we have a slim, tall, sensitive Eddie, repressed, not masculine.. not sexual. 

at the end we have a physically extrovert, visceral and more primal albeit dying Eddie who is finally in touch with his inner self. At the cost of his life.
his masculinity [in crude terms] is unleashed but it is through fighting with men, and not through making love to women

We know that in Italy, family betrayers would be killed by their communities [at that time]. But Marco in this production is fervent when he says that Eddie humiliated his brother.

is this really about men? 

of course it is about other things.  immigration. hunger. depression. being an American. being a longshoreman. about what is law, moral law, natural law

but what is at its heart? eddie's journey, his self realising?


Popular posts from this blog

Collabo- Hip hop with a difference

There’s a buzz in the air at Stratford Circus Arts Centre. No wonder, this is the 10th anniversary of Collabo, Tony Adigun’s annual dance celebration founded in 2006 to promote new collaborations and hip-hop hybrids from dance groups. Friday’s program of short portfolios opens with 10 (UnTitled Dance Company) choreographed by Lukas McFarlane lasting fifteen minutes (no mean feat in the hip-hop world) and featuring 10 tracks and illustrating some super synchronised steps and gyros executed with military precision. The occasional, surprising rigidness of the choreography is broken by experimentation with spoken word. Liberation (What Is Written Dance Company) has the same exactness, but their more simple choreography is easier on the eye after the mass sprawl of 10. Kweku Aacht and Guest Dancers produce an interpretation of a track performed live onstage- the sometimes rowdy crowd shouting out and encouraging the performers on hold their breath as the troupe fluctuate between free style a…

Once in a Lifetime- theatre review: slightly revised to reflect the ambiguous ending

Once in a Lifetime is a show about the tenuous and complicated relationship between creativity and destruction. Re-adapted here by Chris Hart, son of one half of the original writing duo Moss Hart and George S Kaufman, the show may well be set in 1930s Hollywood just as the talkies are about to change cinema forever, but it might also be poking fun at an art form that is a little closer to home. Director Richard Jones always takes risks with little produced, marginalised or very well known works in a bid to uncover something new that might be a comment on our own times. Here, a story about hapless Vaudeville trio act George (John Marquez), Jerry (Kevin Bishop) and May (Claudie Blakley), who set out to conquer Hollywood with their mythic elocution school, is the perfect fit for the director to explore themes that seem to obsess him: national myth, parody, the tyranny of power, willed self-destruction, bureaucracy, global fantasy, etc. So far, the show has not gone down so well with the c…

Walking the Tightrope- Theatre Delicatessen

Site-specific set? Perhaps. In the old Guardian offices in Farringdon, Offstage Theatre and Theatre Uncut curate a cycle of 12 short plays exploring the tension[s] between art and politics, reactions to the budget cuts to the arts in the UK and debate freedom of expression controversies. Corruption, class divides, perception, blood money, gesture politics and culpability, it’s all there and recent topical events are given stage time, from The Tricycle’s controversial decision to withdraw their support for the UK Jewish Film Festival to the Barbican’s cancelled Exhibit B. The plays are entertaining- Sun City by April De Angelis, Re: Exhibit by Gbolahan Obisesan, Old Newland by Julie Pascal, Tickets are on Sale Now by Caryl Churchill and Exhibit A, by Neil LaBute, all deserve special mention for looking beyond the parameters of funding and freedom of expression in the UK arts- by which of course, I mean a theatrical London still surfing the very last trickling waves of Colonialism and it…