Skip to main content

Bull- Young Vic

‘You really are a bitch’
‘Be a man Thomas, and then someone might find you attractive.’ [really?]
Bull
So goes it in Bull. A complimentary play to Mike Bartlett’s Cock, about antics and control in the bedroom. But here we have control in the boardroom where Thomas [Sam Troughton] Isobel [Eleanor Matsuura] and Tony [Adam James] wait around in the corporate ring designed by Soutra Gilmour, for Carter [Neil Stuke], who will deliver some bad news.
Thomas, Isobel and Tony. One of them must be fired in a company reshuffle, Isobel and Tony are kindred spirits, perhaps they are fucking, we don’t know. Thomas- who never wanted to be called Tom- seems, from their perspective, an alien. He has bad breath, he has dandruff, he hasn’t got a girlfriend, he’s offensive, he slouches, he’s short, he doesn’t drink and he has wobbly bits- he just isn’t part of the team and this is enough to make Isobel and Tony, vying to stay employed, gang up against the man.
The story world is already decided for us, the reflection is this- that the characters are fully initiated into the corporate world, the environment is all about slay or be slain, we are in Darwin country. Perhaps it is good for the national soul and cathartic.
No doubt, the play is savage. The barbarisms are not savage though- the slights the characters throw at one another are just that- slight and just, well, petty. And non of it is quite believable. It’s as though the characters are playing a well written game, one they’ve all played before, with the ending in sight and like something out of a Charlie Brooker drama for Channel Four.
But. Where the play works and is savage, is on a deeper level. Thomas is a man thrown deep into provocation- like a Bull provoked by a conquistador, goaded on by a willing audience.
And somewhere in there, in the play, we are given the idea that Thomas is stupid and so, deserving. He can’t see what is being done to him and rises to the bait every time. How can that be good for the workplace? Thomas can’t be absorbed, he must go. Does that excuse Tony and Isobel?
I guess everyone must be agreed about this. We know who the awful people are [everyone], even as Thomas is criticized for being ‘personal’ and believing in a ‘meritocracy’ where the good win out in the end. In reality, the concept of goodness is far more complicated [ I miss the complication in this play- it is never quite so black and white, no matter how much we want to believe]. But we are watching a form of ethnic cleansing take place.
So Bull speaks to something far deeper in us. The desire to kill off the weak. That primal desire the bully feels when he knows- or rather and more importantly, believes his victim is weaker than him. The mistake though, from an audience point of view, is to view this as so. That the victim is weaker. The genius of this Young Vic production, in the round in the Maria studio, is to make everyone complicit- without realising. But Thomas is not stupid and weak because he cannot stand up for himself, rather, he is just innocent. He won’t willingly trade slights unless he is angry and then his anger takes over. Then he becomes stupid because he is guided by passion [see Zizek’s essay on the recent Charlie Hebdo atrocity]. But he is not an idiot unless he is an innocent one- in the Dostoevskian sense of the word.
In the end, this play is really about the audience, where they form a fifth character- passive and in their passivity, or nervous laughter, so complicit. Do brutality and laughter go hand in hand? Marvelously here. Who is having the last laugh? The playwright or the audience, as Thomas sprawls on the floor, metaphorically killed?
Wounding, Mike Bartlett’s pen for a sword is merciless, Bull continues at the Young Vic until 14th February.


Direction Clare Lizzimore
Design Soutra Gilmour
Light Peter Mumford
Sound Christopher Shutt
Casting Amy Ball & Lotte Hines 
Associate Director Jonathan O'Boyle
Associate Designer Rachel Wingate
Associate Ligting Designer Kati Hind
With
Adam James
Eleanor Matsuura
Neil Stuke
Sam Troughton

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Collabo- Hip hop with a difference

There’s a buzz in the air at Stratford Circus Arts Centre. No wonder, this is the 10th anniversary of Collabo, Tony Adigun’s annual dance celebration founded in 2006 to promote new collaborations and hip-hop hybrids from dance groups. Friday’s program of short portfolios opens with 10 (UnTitled Dance Company) choreographed by Lukas McFarlane lasting fifteen minutes (no mean feat in the hip-hop world) and featuring 10 tracks and illustrating some super synchronised steps and gyros executed with military precision. The occasional, surprising rigidness of the choreography is broken by experimentation with spoken word. Liberation (What Is Written Dance Company) has the same exactness, but their more simple choreography is easier on the eye after the mass sprawl of 10. Kweku Aacht and Guest Dancers produce an interpretation of a track performed live onstage- the sometimes rowdy crowd shouting out and encouraging the performers on hold their breath as the troupe fluctuate between free style a…

Once in a Lifetime- theatre review: slightly revised to reflect the ambiguous ending

Once in a Lifetime is a show about the tenuous and complicated relationship between creativity and destruction. Re-adapted here by Chris Hart, son of one half of the original writing duo Moss Hart and George S Kaufman, the show may well be set in 1930s Hollywood just as the talkies are about to change cinema forever, but it might also be poking fun at an art form that is a little closer to home. Director Richard Jones always takes risks with little produced, marginalised or very well known works in a bid to uncover something new that might be a comment on our own times. Here, a story about hapless Vaudeville trio act George (John Marquez), Jerry (Kevin Bishop) and May (Claudie Blakley), who set out to conquer Hollywood with their mythic elocution school, is the perfect fit for the director to explore themes that seem to obsess him: national myth, parody, the tyranny of power, willed self-destruction, bureaucracy, global fantasy, etc. So far, the show has not gone down so well with the c…

Walking the Tightrope- Theatre Delicatessen

Site-specific set? Perhaps. In the old Guardian offices in Farringdon, Offstage Theatre and Theatre Uncut curate a cycle of 12 short plays exploring the tension[s] between art and politics, reactions to the budget cuts to the arts in the UK and debate freedom of expression controversies. Corruption, class divides, perception, blood money, gesture politics and culpability, it’s all there and recent topical events are given stage time, from The Tricycle’s controversial decision to withdraw their support for the UK Jewish Film Festival to the Barbican’s cancelled Exhibit B. The plays are entertaining- Sun City by April De Angelis, Re: Exhibit by Gbolahan Obisesan, Old Newland by Julie Pascal, Tickets are on Sale Now by Caryl Churchill and Exhibit A, by Neil LaBute, all deserve special mention for looking beyond the parameters of funding and freedom of expression in the UK arts- by which of course, I mean a theatrical London still surfing the very last trickling waves of Colonialism and it…